ArticleCommunications physics2026
Discovering Governing Physics in the Presence of Uncertainty.
Article in Communications physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the study of complex dynamical systems, accurately modeling the underlying physics is crucial for predicting system behavior. Yet real-world systems exhibit pronounced input variability and are observed through noisy, limited data that confound traditional methods assuming fixed-coefficient models. In this work, we theorize that accounting for system variability together with measurement noise is the key to consistently discover the governing equations underlying dynamical systems. We introduce a stochastic inverse physics-discovery (SIP) framework that treats unknown coefficients as random variables and infers their posterior distributions by minimizing the Kullback-Leibler divergence between the push-forward of posterior samples and the empirical data distribution. Tests on ten scenarios spanning predator-prey dynamics, chaotic attractors, oscillatory systems, ecological records, and liquid infiltration demonstrate that SIP consistently outperforms seven methods across three paradigms, reducing coefficient error by about 80% and achieving perfect structural identification in seven of ten cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.