Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42889000›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026

Online adaptive E-tutorials for development of critical appraisal skills.

Loyola McLean, Samuel Lane, Erick C N Wong, Louise Nash, Eryn L Werry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Loyola McLeanThe Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Samuel LaneSchool of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Erick C N WongSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Louise NashThe Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Eryn L WerrySchool of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Critical appraisal of research literature is an important skill for graduates yet science graduate employers report dissatisfaction with skill levels. As scaffolding can assist in critical appraisal development, we aimed to develop and evaluate 2 adaptive e-tutorials for critical appraisal development of neuropharmacology research articles as part of the scaffolding process. We developed adaptive e-tutorials allowing personalised feedback and remediation. Results of an end-of-tutorial survey, and comparisons of institutional Unit of Study Survey ratings and exam results in the 2 years before, and during, the intervention were analysed. Over 4 years, 150 students participated. In the cohorts that did not complete the e-tutorial, there were significant differences in exam marks between students of different academic backgrounds (non-science < science < medicine backgrounds; p < 0.05), while no significant differences between groups were seen in students that completed the e-tutorial, and these marks were statistically equivalent. Students ranked their perceived benefit from the videos, increase in critical appraisal ability, and value of the e-tutorial with average rankings between 4.4-4.6 on a Likert scale (5 = strongly agree). Similarly, students who completed the e-tutorial showed a significant increase in rating of their critical thinking skills in the Unit of Study Survey (p < 0.05). Completion of the e-tutorial was associated with increased equitable development of critical appraisal. Students from non-science backgrounds showed the biggest increase in actual appraisal performance, suggesting that while the e-tutorial was associated with increased confidence for all students, the other features of the course may have developed appraisal levels to a stage sufficient for successful exam completion.

Indexed as

adaptive e-tutorialsanimationscritical appraisalgraduate skill developmentpharmacology education

Identifiers

PMID42889000
PMCPMC13668495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.