SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2026
Resection rates after conversion therapy for initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Conversion therapy may create an opportunity for liver resection in selected patients with initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but reported conversion rates use heterogeneous denominators and endpoints. We estimated actual completed hepatectomy using a verified all-treated denominator. Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Library/CENTRAL, Wanfang Data, and CNKI were searched through April 10, 2026. Eligible cohorts included initially or baseline unresectable HCC, an all-treated denominator, and completed liver resection events. Two authors independently assessed eligibility, extracted data, and evaluated risk of bias. Random-effects logit proportion meta-analysis, Hartung-Knapp sensitivity, prediction intervals, leave-one-out analyses, treatment-strategy subgroups, publication-year meta-regression, and small-study-effect diagnostics were undertaken. PROSPERO: CRD420261360108. Results: Thirty-seven reports represented 36 unique studies; 34 studies involving 5,137 patients and 1,042 completed hepatectomies entered the quantitative synthesis. The crude aggregate resection rate was 20.3% (1,042/5,137), whereas the random-effects modeled pooled rate was 25.40% (95% CI, 20.74%-30.69%; I Conclusions: Approximately one-quarter of patients initiating conversion therapy underwent actual hepatectomy, but the crude and modeled estimates differ because substantial heterogeneity changes random-effects study weighting. The pooled estimate is a cross-study, cross-era benchmark for multidisciplinary decision-making rather than a universal patient-level probability or a treatment-specific efficacy estimate. Systematic Review Registration: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420261360108.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.