Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42888989›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2026

Immunomodulatory potential of Mongolian medicine in sepsis: current evidence, challenges, and translational perspectives.

Shaohua Cui, Di Wu, Yongli Zhang, Lixia Geng

Abstract readReviewSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shaohua Cui *Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Baotou Medical College, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou, China.
Di Wu *Department of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Baotou Medical College, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou, China.
Yongli ZhangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Lixia GengDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Baotou Medical College, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis is a heterogeneous, time-dependent syndrome in which inflammatory injury, immune suppression, endothelial dysfunction, metabolic disturbance, and barrier failure may coexist. This narrative review evaluates whether current pharmacological evidence provides a defensible basis for investigating Traditional Mongolian Medicine as an adjunctive source of immunomodulatory candidates in sepsis. A concise account of sepsis immunopathology is used as an interpretive framework, after which evidence from named Mongolian formulas, extracts, medicinal materials, and isolated constituents is mapped according to ethnomedical specificity, model directness, and study-design limitations. Direct sepsis-specific evidence is scarce. Daruqi particles, HHQG, Hohgardi-9, Nagab-9, Monflu, Batri-7, Qiqirigan-8, and selected extracts have mainly been studied in lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury, organ-injury, enteritis, inflammatory, or metabolic models. These studies suggest effects on NF-κB/MAPK signaling, myeloid-cell infiltration, neutrophil extracellular traps, redox regulation, and lipid metabolism, but generally do not assess polymicrobial infection, pathogen clearance, survival, late immunosuppression, or human immune endotypes. Widely distributed compounds such as quercetin, berberine, geniposide, and gallate are therefore treated only as non-specific constituent-level evidence of pharmacological plausibility. We propose candidate-specific priorities for chemical standardization, rigorous sepsis modeling, pharmacokinetic and safety evaluation, and biomarker-guided translation. The current literature supports an ethnopharmacology-informed research agenda, not therapeutic efficacy in sepsis.

Indexed as

Immunologic FactorsImmunomodulating AgentsMedicine, Mongolian TraditionalSepsisAnimalsHumansImmunomodulationTranslational Research, BiomedicalImmunologic FactorsImmunomodulating Agentsgut microbiotaimmune checkpointsimmune dysregulationimmunometabolismimmunomodulationinflammasomeMongolian medicinesepsis

Identifiers

PMID42888989
PMCPMC13668521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.