Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42888979›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sociology2026

"The information exists, but it's your job to find it": 1.5-generation immigrants' encounters with public institutions.

Pnina Dolberg, Karin Amit, Avital Kaye-Tzadok

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pnina DolbergDepartment of Social Work, Ruppin Academic Center, Emek Hefer, Israel.
Karin AmitThe Institute of Immigration and Social Integration, Ruppin Academic Center, Emek Hefer, Israel.
Avital Kaye-TzadokDepartment of Social Work, Ruppin Academic Center, Emek Hefer, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public institutions play a central role in immigrants' access to rights, resources, and opportunities, yet less is known about how immigrants experience encounters across multiple institutional settings during the early years following migration. Based on qualitative interviews with 21 immigrants from the former Soviet Union to Israel, this study examines how adults who immigrated during adolescence (referred to as the 1.5 generation) retrospectively describe and interpret their early interactions with public institutions. We identify four central themes: absence of institutional guidance, institutional misfit and misrecognition, active mediation by immigrant youth within their families, and localized experiences of support within specific institutional contexts. Participants' accounts point to a recurring gap between the formal availability of institutional resources and participants' ability to identify, access, and use those resources in practice. Information, guidance, mediation, recognition, and cultural sensitivity shaped how they experienced institutional encounters, while adolescents often became central intermediaries between their families and public systems. Positive experiences were commonly associated with particular institutional actors or structured programs that provided support and opportunities. The study highlights the value of examining early institutional encounters from a broader vantage point of adulthood.

Indexed as

1.5 generation immigrantsimmigrant satisfactioninstitutional encounterspublic institutionsretrospective interpretation

Identifiers

PMID42888979
PMCPMC13668496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.