Observational studyCardiovascular therapeutics2026
Prasugrel Outperforms Ticagrelor in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Real-World Analysis.
Observational study in Cardiovascular therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor is standard for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), yet real-world comparisons of ticagrelor and prasugrel remain limited. We evaluated their relative effectiveness and safety using the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network (2010-2024). Adult ACS patients receiving prasugrel or ticagrelor within 24 h post-PCI were included. The primary endpoint was a 1-year composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and cerebral infarction; secondary endpoints included individual components, major bleeding, and repeat revascularization. Propensity score matching balanced baseline characteristics, with subgroup and sensitivity analyses assessing robustness. Among 14,895 matched pairs (n = 29,790) from 126,273 patients, prasugrel was associated with lower risk of the composite endpoint (HR 0.641; 95% CI 0.613-0.671), all-cause mortality (HR 0.557; 95% CI 0.487-0.637), and MI (HR 0.648; 95% CI 0.616-0.680), without increased bleeding (HR 0.945; 95% CI 0.824-1.084). Repeat revascularization was higher with prasugrel (HR 1.791; 95% CI 1.639-1.957). Effects were consistent across subgroups. In this real-world setting, prasugrel demonstrated superior effectiveness over ticagrelor in reducing mortality and ischemic events without increasing the risk of bleeding, although higher rates of repeat revascularization warrant further study. These findings support prasugrel as a potentially preferred P2Y12 inhibitor in selected ACS patients undergoing PCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.