ReviewJournal of nursing management2026
Understanding Burnout Crossover Contagion: A Concept Analysis Using Walker and Avant's Method.
Review in Journal of nursing management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
AIM(S): To clarify the concept of burnout crossover contagion using Walker and Avant's concept analysis method and to identify its defining attributes, antecedents, consequences, and implications for nursing management.
backgroundBurnout may extend beyond individual employees through interpersonal processes within shared work environments. However, burnout crossover contagion remains inconsistently conceptualized, with unclear boundaries from related constructs and limited synthesis of its defining attributes, antecedents, and consequences. EVALUATION: Walker and Avant's concept analysis method was applied to synthesize formally included studies on burnout crossover and contagion. Evidence was examined to identify uses of the concept, defining attributes, antecedents, consequences, and empirical referents. KEY ISSUE(S): Three defining attributes were identified: interpersonal interaction, direct and indirect transmission, and synchronization of burnout manifestations. Antecedents included shared occupational stressors, transmission-related conditions, and individual characteristics, while consequences were identified at individual and organizational levels. A hypothesis-generating nursing-team-specific extension was developed in which shiftwork, handoffs, staffing instability, task interdependence, and repeated team interaction are conceptualized as contextual or exposure-related conditions that may increase opportunities for interpersonal burnout transmission rather than as established causal mechanisms. CONCLUSION(S): Burnout crossover contagion is an interpersonal phenomenon involving the transmission and increasing convergence of burnout manifestations between individuals. The proposed framework requires further empirical testing using longitudinal, dyadic, multilevel, and social network approaches, particularly to distinguish interpersonal transmission from burnout similarity attributable to shared occupational conditions. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Nurse managers should consider burnout as both an individual occupational health concern and a potential relational risk within nursing teams. Stable staffing, equitable workload allocation, sufficient recovery, supportive leadership, psychologically safe handoffs, and structured team support may represent potential management approaches; however, their effectiveness in preventing or reducing burnout crossover contagion requires empirical validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.