SynthesisJournal of nursing management2026
From Evidence to Strategic Insight: Preliminary Model Development and Validation for Exploring Potential Changes and Enhancing Nursing Work Performance.
Synthesis in Journal of nursing management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
AIM (S): To develop a dynamic analytical framework integrating nursing work performance types and their influencing factors and explore potential changes under different management strategies.
backgroundNursing work performance directly influences healthcare quality and patient safety. However, existing research has not yet established an analytical framework that systematically integrates nursing work performance types, their influencing factors, and the dynamic mechanisms. METHOD (S): A systematic literature review and system dynamics (SD) approach were applied. Expert evaluation and parameter perturbations were used to assess the structural rationality and stability of the model.
resultsOf 2289 records identified, 1619 unique records were screened, and 47 studies were included. Five types of nursing work performance were extracted and synthesized: Quality Safety, Rescue Efficiency, Patient Satisfaction, Job Satisfaction, and Process Optimization. Seven organizational factors were identified: Cultural Climate, Leader Attitude, Supervisory Governance, Incentives and Support, Resource Allocation, Task Allocation, and Education and Training. Three individual factors were identified: Physiological State, Professional Competence, and Psychological State. Based on these findings, an SD model was constructed using causal loop and stock-and-flow diagrams to represent the relationships among these components. Expert evaluation indicated that the model structure was generally reasonable and that the model outputs maintained broadly consistent directional trends under parameter perturbations and simulation scenarios. Finally, scenario simulations were conducted to analyze potential changes in nursing work performance under different management strategies. CONCLUSION (S): This study presents a preliminary, hypothesis-generating SD framework for representing potential relationships among organizational factors, individual factors, and nursing work performance. Future studies should validate the model's generalizability across different healthcare settings and countries and incorporate real-world implementation outcomes to further evaluate its practical effectiveness. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: This model identified organizational factors and nursing work performance outcomes that warrant priority testing in future empirical research. Because the model has not been externally calibrated or validated using real-world longitudinal data, its results should primarily be used to generate research hypotheses rather than directly inform the design of specific management interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.