ReviewUnited European gastroenterology journal2026
Antibiotic Stewardship in Cirrhosis: Current Recommendations and Clinical Challenges.
Review in United European gastroenterology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacterial infections are a major cause of mortality in cirrhosis, with antibiotic prophylaxis and empirical treatment embedded in international guidelines. However, the prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms and the epidemiology of infections have shifted considerably in recent decades. This review critically appraises the evidence underlying guideline recommendations on antibiotic prophylaxis for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and acute variceal bleeding in cirrhosis, and antimicrobial management in acute liver failure. The evidence-underlying current recommendations is limited and predates the current era of widespread antimicrobial resistance, challenging their applicability in current practice. Emerging evidence suggests that primary prophylaxis should be reconsidered, alternatives such as rifaximin warrant further evaluation against established fluoroquinolone regimens, and shorter antibiotic courses may be non-inferior to standard durations. New double-blind placebo-controlled, non-inferiority and Bayesian trials are needed to evaluate antibiotic regimens and microbiome- and barrier-directed interventions, supported by improved diagnostics, while minimising treatment duration, toxicity and selection for antimicrobial resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.