Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42888911›Full record

ReviewUnited European gastroenterology journal2026

Antibiotic Stewardship in Cirrhosis: Current Recommendations and Clinical Challenges.

Solaiman Ezzafzafi, Kimberly K I M Bot, Lucas H P Bernts, Reinier M van Hest, Alastair O'Brien, Michiel A van Agtmael, Jarne M van Hattem, Marten A Lantinga

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in United European gastroenterology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Solaiman EzzafzafiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1069-2586
Kimberly K I M BotDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Lucas H P BerntsDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboudumc, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Reinier M van HestDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy and Clinical Pharmacology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2506-8795
Alastair O'BrienCentre for Immunobiology and Infection, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9168-7009
Michiel A van AgtmaelDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7966-6934
Jarne M van HattemDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4946-2332
Marten A LantingaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3137-901X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial infections are a major cause of mortality in cirrhosis, with antibiotic prophylaxis and empirical treatment embedded in international guidelines. However, the prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms and the epidemiology of infections have shifted considerably in recent decades. This review critically appraises the evidence underlying guideline recommendations on antibiotic prophylaxis for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and acute variceal bleeding in cirrhosis, and antimicrobial management in acute liver failure. The evidence-underlying current recommendations is limited and predates the current era of widespread antimicrobial resistance, challenging their applicability in current practice. Emerging evidence suggests that primary prophylaxis should be reconsidered, alternatives such as rifaximin warrant further evaluation against established fluoroquinolone regimens, and shorter antibiotic courses may be non-inferior to standard durations. New double-blind placebo-controlled, non-inferiority and Bayesian trials are needed to evaluate antibiotic regimens and microbiome- and barrier-directed interventions, supported by improved diagnostics, while minimising treatment duration, toxicity and selection for antimicrobial resistance.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisAntimicrobial StewardshipBacterial InfectionsLiver CirrhosisPeritonitisEsophageal and Gastric VaricesGastrointestinal HemorrhageHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicRifaximinAnti-Bacterial AgentsRifaximinacute liver failureantibiotic prophylaxisantimicrobial resistanceantimicrobial stewardshipcirrhosisspontaneous bacterial peritonitisvariceal bleeding

Identifiers

PMID42888911
PMCPMC13675727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.