ArticleBJS open2026
Multiple R1 margins are associated with shorter overall survival: national register-based study on pancreatic cancer.
Article in BJS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundResection status is associated with overall survival among patients operated on for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study investigated whether the number of R1 margins is associated with shorter survival.
methodsAdult patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for primary resectable PDAC between 2017 and 2024 recorded in the Swedish National Pancreatic Registry were included. Overall survival was analysed according to overall R status and the number of R1 margins. Overall survival was analysed using Kaplan-Meier estimates, Cox regression analysis for estimated adjusted survival time, and Laplace regression for analysis of percentile distribution.
resultsOverall, 1043 patients were included, 398 patients (38.2%) with R0 and 645 patients (61.8%) with R1 margins. The adjusted median survival was 8.2 (95% confidence interval (c.i.) -12.0 to -4.3) months shorter for patients with R1 versus R0 margins, with a progressively shorter survival with a higher number of R1 margins. Specifically, compared with R0 margins, the adjusted median survival for one, two and three or more R1 margins was 4.6 (95% c.i. -10.2 to 1.0), 6.7 (95% c.i. -11.9 to -1.5), and 12.4 (95% c.i. -16.5 to -8.3) months shorter, respectively.
conclusionsPatients with R1 margins had an adjusted median survival that was 8 months shorter than patients with R0 margins. An increased number of R1 margins was associated with shorter survival. These results suggest that the current practice of reporting binary R status is insufficient, and future guidelines should consider revising this routine and adopt a standardized, detailed margin assessment protocol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.