ArticlePhysical review. E2026
Discovering interpretable low-dimensional dynamics using maximum entropy.
Article in Physical review. E, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Discovering interpretable low-dimensional dynamics using maximum entropy.Physical review. E · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Models (i.e., governing equations) are fundamental to science and engineering. Advances in data acquisition now make it possible to extract interpretable, low-dimensional descriptions from high-dimensional observations. However, existing approaches sacrifice either interpretability for reconstruction accuracy or infer symbolic dynamics without relating latent coordinates to physically meaningful observables. Here we present Edwin (maximum entropy-driven compression with interpretable nonlinear model discovery), a unified framework that simultaneously performs dimensionality reduction using the dynamic maximum entropy (DME) principle and discovers sparse symbolic models governing latent dynamics, as well as the coupling between learned features and external metadata. We validate Edwin on diverse simulated systems, including stochastic diffusion, the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process, self-assembling particles, and neural population firing rates, as well as on a noisy experimental time series of aggregating RNA-liposome complexes. Across all systems, Edwin recovers low-dimensional symbolic models that are physically interpretable and generalize to unseen conditions. Together, these results establish Edwin as a principled framework for inferring interpretable, low-dimensional dynamics from high-dimensional nonnegative data.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.