ArticleMedicine2026
Comparative outcomes of arteriovenous accesses with and without tunneled hemodialysis catheters: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study compared patency rates of arteriovenous accesses with and without concurrent tunneled hemodialysis catheter (THC) use, addressing limited research on combined outcomes. A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on patients undergoing arteriovenous access creation at a single hospital between January 2021 and December 2022. Primary outcomes were the 6-month primary patency rate and functional dialysis success. Secondary outcomes were the factors associated with each of these endpoints. Statistical analyses employed t tests, chi-square tests, logistic regression, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves. A total of 319 vascular accesses were included. The 6-month patency rate was significantly higher in the access-only group than in the access + THC group (87.04% vs 78.20%, P = .04). THC usage (odds ratio [OR] = 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25-0.95, P = .03), graft usage (OR = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.18-0.82, P = .01), and higher hemoglobin levels (OR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.65-0.96, P = .02) were associated with reduced patency rates. Functional dialysis success at 6 months did not differ significantly between groups (87.96% vs 83.89%, P = .21). However, older age (OR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.93-0.99, P = .01), use of a cubital artery to an autologous vein (OR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.19-0.82, P = .01) or graft (OR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.17-0.97, P = .04), and higher hemoglobin levels (OR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.66-0.99, P = .03) were associated with a lower likelihood of functional dialysis success. Concurrent THC use was independently associated with reduced 6-month primary patency without a corresponding reduction in the short-term delivery of dialysis, suggesting an increased need for interventions to maintain the access. Judicious use of THCs and careful consideration of the vascular access type are important to optimize vascular access outcomes in patients undergoing hemodialysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.