SynthesisMedicine2026
Effectiveness of kinesio tape in the treatment of patients with plantar fasciitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA meta-analysis was conducted to assess the clinical efficacy of Kinesio tape (KT) for the management of plantar fasciitis.
methodsTwo investigators conducted an electronic literature search independently to evaluate the results of the KT treatment for patellofemoral pain syndrome. As of November 2024, the electronic databases included in the search were PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, the Wanfang Database, the China Journal Full-Text Database China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and the VIP database. The search was limited to languages in Chinese and English. The extraction and inclusion indexes comprised pain visual analogue scale or numerical rating scale, ankle function American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society and plantar fascia thickness. Following the extraction of the data, a meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 17.0.
resultA total of 16 studies were included in the review, all of which were randomized controlled trials. Subgroup analyses based on intervention types revealed significant differences. Compared with controls, KT combined with other active therapies (e.g., extracorporeal shock wave therapy, muscle energy techniques) significantly relieved pain (mean difference [MD] = -1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-2.1, 0], P = .05, I2 = 96%). However, KT as a monotherapy showed no statistically significant pain reduction over controls (MD = -0.54, 95% CI [-1.21, 0.13], P = .11, I2 = 90%). For ankle function American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, only the combined therapy group showed significant improvement (MD = 7.6, P < .00001), while KT alone did not (MD = -0.9, P = .8).
conclusionKT demonstrated a statistically significant but clinically modest reduction in pain in patients with plantar fasciitis. However, the effect size did not reach the generally recognized minimal clinically important difference threshold, suggesting that the clinical benefit may be limited. KT may be considered as an adjunctive therapy, particularly when combined with other treatments, but its role as a standalone intervention remains questionable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.