Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42888611›Full record

ArticleMedicine2026

Numerical investigation of the impact of neural stem cells on brain tumors.

Pius Erheyovwe Bubu, Val Hyginus Udoka Eze, Kelechi John Ukagwu, Vidya Sankarapandian, Saidi Odoma, Awafung Emmanuel Adie, Nansamba Fridah Mirembe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pius Erheyovwe BubuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Kampala International University, Western Campus, Bushenyi Ishaka, Uganda.
Val Hyginus Udoka EzeDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Kihumuro, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-6764-1721
Kelechi John UkagwuDepartment of Electrical, Telecommunication, and Computer Engineering, Kampala International University, Western Campus, Bushenyi Ishaka, Uganda.
Vidya SankarapandianDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Kampala International University, Bushenyi Ishaka, Uganda.
Saidi OdomaDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Kampala International University, Western Campus, Bushenyi Ishaka, Uganda.
Awafung Emmanuel AdieDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Kampala International University, Western Campus, Bushenyi Ishaka, Uganda.
Nansamba Fridah MirembeDepartment of Nursing Science, Kampala International University, Western Campus, Ishaka, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malignant brain tumors, including glioblastoma and medulloblastoma, remain highly treatment-resistant. Neural stem cells (NSCs) are being investigated as tumor-tropic therapeutic vectors, but the temporal interaction between tumor and NSC populations requires quantitative characterization before model-based treatment hypotheses can be interpreted reliably. This study aimed to develop and numerically evaluate a reproducible 2-population model of tumor-NSC dynamics and to quantify the influence of NSC persistence and NSC-mediated tumor killing on simulated tumor burden. A normalized system of 2 coupled nonlinear ordinary differential equations was used: dT/dt = rT(1 - T) - βTN and dN/dt = αN(1 - N) - γTN. The baseline simulation used r = 0.20000 day-1, α = 0.05000 day-1, β = 0.35000 day-1, γ = 0.30000 day-1, T0 = 0.50000, and N0 = 0.40000. Explicit Euler integration was performed with Δt = 0.01 day over 20 days. A descriptive nonlinear regression fit, Fourier spectral analysis, 1-parameter sensitivity analyses, and joint α-β sensitivity analysis were applied to the simulated trajectory. In the baseline simulation, tumor density decreased from 0.5000 to a minimum of 0.4772 at day 2.59 (4.57% below the initial value) and subsequently increased to T20 = 0.8273, while NSC density declined from 0.4000 to N20 = 0.0247. The descriptive regression reproduced the simulated tumor trajectory with R2 = 0.9973 and root mean square error = 0.00590. Increasing α from 0.05 to 0.10 day-1 reduced T20 by 12.6% relative to baseline, and increasing β from 0.35 to 0.50 day-1 reduced T20 by 19.9%. Jointly setting α = 0.10 and β = 0.50 day-1 yielded T20 = 0.4427, 46.5% below the baseline terminal tumor density. The Fourier spectrum was dominated by the zero and low-frequency components, with no distinct oscillatory peak over the 20-day window. The model indicates that NSC persistence and NSC-mediated tumor killing materially influence terminal tumor burden, but the baseline parameterization produces only transient early suppression followed by tumor regrowth as the NSC population declines. The results are population-level, model-based estimates rather than tumor-type-specific clinical efficacy measures. Tumour-specific calibration, spatial migration, immune interactions, and experimental validation are required before translational conclusions can be drawn.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsModels, BiologicalNeural Stem CellsAnimalsComputer SimulationHumansbrain tumorsmalignant brain tumorneural stem cells (NSCs)numerical simulationtherapeutic potentialtumor dynamics

Identifiers

PMID42888611
PMCPMC13681089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.