ArticleMedicine2026
Association of the dietary carbohydrate-to-fiber ratio with prevalent rheumatoid arthritis in NHANES 2009-2018.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study examines the cross-sectional association between the carbohydrate-to-fiber ratio (CFR), an indicator of carbohydrate quality, and prevalent rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). The exposure was overall CFR, calculated from 2 days of dietary recall and categorized into population-wide quartiles. RA diagnosis was the outcome. Survey-weighted logistic regression was used to evaluate the CFR-RA association, adjusting for demographic, lifestyle, dietary, and metabolic covariates. Generalized additive models, subgroup analyses, and interaction tests were performed. An exploratory survey-weighted mediation analysis evaluated SII as a hypothesized intermediate factor. The study ultimately included 19,260 participants aged ≥ 20 years with valid 2-day dietary weights, with a survey-weighted RA prevalence of 4.31%. Higher CFR was significantly associated with increased RA odds, with the highest quartile showing 67% higher odds than the lowest (P < .001). After exclusion of CFR values above the upper fence defined using the interquartile range, the model 4 GAM showed an effectively linear positive association. A sensitivity analysis retaining all CFR observations showed curvature in the sparsely populated upper tail with wide uncertainty. In the exploratory model 4 mediation analysis, the estimated indirect association through SII was small (4.77% of the total association; 95% confidence interval: -5.33% to 14.87%), and its confidence interval included the null. Higher CFR was associated with greater odds of prevalent self-reported RA. Longitudinal and genetically informed studies are needed before causal or preventive interpretations can be made.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.