SynthesisMedicine2026
Effectiveness of traditional mind-body exercises on fall risk test scores and balance in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of traditional mind-body exercises on fall risk test scores and balance in older adults.
methodsThe systematic search covered multiple databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and Weipu (VIP), with the search period spanning from the inception of each database to December 10, 2025. We included randomized controlled trials evaluating the effects of traditional mind-body exercises on fall risk test scores and balance in older adults. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 15 software and a random-effects model.
resultsA total of 31 randomized controlled trials involving 3622 participants were included. Pooled analyses showed lower fall risk test scores (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.84 to -0.28) and higher Berg Balance Scale scores (WMD = 2.60, 95% CI: 1.47-3.72) in the intervention groups than in the control groups. Heterogeneity was very high for Berg Balance Scale scores (I2 = 95.6%). Subgroup results for fall risk test scores were Baduanjin (BDJ) [SMD = -0.82, 95% CI (-1.25, -0.38)] and Tai Chi (TC) [SMD = -0.41, 95% CI (-0.70, -0.11)]. For Berg Balance Scale scores, results were BDJ [WMD = 2.91, 95% CI (1.02, 4.8)], TC [WMD = 2.37, 95% CI (0.83, 3.9)], and Wuqinxi (WQX) [weighted mean difference (WMD) = 4.80, 95% CI (1.40, 8.20)]. Examples of protocols used in the included trials included Tai Chi twice weekly for 55 minutes per session over 8 weeks, Baduanjin 3 times weekly for 40 minutes per session over 12 weeks, and Wuqinxi 4 times weekly for 60 minutes per session over 12 weeks.
conclusionLow-certainty evidence suggests that Tai Chi and Baduanjin may reduce fall risk test scores and improve balance in older adults, while Wuqinxi may improve balance. These findings should be interpreted cautiously and do not establish a reduction in actual fall incidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.