ArticleMedicine2026
Efficacy of auricular bloodletting therapy for acute urticaria: A propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute urticaria is a common condition that can affect individuals across all age groups. Current pharmacological treatments primarily rely on antihistamines and corticosteroids. However, these therapies may be limited by suboptimal efficacy, dose- and time-dependence, and potential adverse effects. Therefore, the incorporation of effective adjunctive therapies is of considerable clinical value. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of auricular bloodletting (BL) therapy on the length of hospital stay in patients with acute urticaria. Poisson regression was used to compare differences in hospitalization duration between groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to minimize selection bias. Subgroup analyses by sex and age, as well as robustness checks using bootstrap resampling and Rosenbaum sensitivity analysis, were also performed. Before PSM, Poisson regression indicated that the bloodletting group had significantly shorter hospital stays. The effect was significant in the male, female, and adult subgroups. After PSM, the incidence rate ratios remained below 1 in all models, and statistical significance was observed. No significant differences were observed in the female or adult subgroups post-matching, whereas statistical significance was retained in the male subgroup. No adverse events were reported. Bootstrap and Rosenbaum sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the findings. Patients who received auricular BL experienced shorter hospital stays. Post-matching results showed that statistical significance was retained in the male subgroup. Given the limited sample size in the intervention group, further prospective studies with larger cohorts are warranted to validate these findings and elucidate the underlying mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.