ArticleBMC psychology2026
Beyond avoidance: negative lying flat and emotional distress among Chinese youth in a 10-day daily diary study.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNegative lying flat (NLF) is a culturally salient form of withdrawal among Chinese youth. In this study, NLF was operationalized as diminished goal pursuit and reduced willingness to expend effort. We examined whether daily NLF is distinguishable from experiential avoidance (EA) and how both are temporally related to anxiety and depressive symptoms.
methodsParticipants were 201 Chinese university students (34.8% male; Mage = 21.04 years, SD = 1.40) who provided 1,863 valid observations across 10 scheduled weekday assessments over two weeks. Three DSEM models examined NLF and EA (Model A), anxiety with both withdrawal constructs (Model B), and depressive symptoms with both withdrawal constructs (Model C), while adjusting between-person components for age and gender. Corresponding NLF and EA paths were compared using posterior contrasts. Calendar-day sensitivity analyses represented the two weekend days as systematically missing within a 12-day calendar.
resultsModel A showed no reliable within-person cross-lagged associations between NLF and EA (NLF→EA: β = 0.030, 95% CrI [-0.046, 0.099]; EA→NLF: β = 0.053, 95% CrI [-0.010, 0.115]). In the joint emotional-distress models, anxiety predicted subsequent NLF (β = 0.113, 95% CrI [0.050, 0.184]) and NLF predicted subsequent anxiety (β = 0.082, 95% CrI [0.023, 0.153]); depressive symptoms predicted subsequent NLF (β = 0.085, 95% CrI [0.015, 0.152]) and NLF predicted subsequent depressive symptoms (β = 0.075, 95% CrI [0.006, 0.134]). Corresponding EA paths included zero, and posterior contrasts did not establish differences between corresponding NLF and EA paths. Calendar-day estimates were similar in direction and magnitude, but the NLF-to-anxiety and NLF-to-depressive-symptoms credible intervals marginally included zero.
conclusionsPrimary models identified reciprocal short-lag associations between NLF and emotional distress that were not observed for EA. Taken together, these findings support continued investigation of NLF as a goal-and-effort withdrawal process in daily emotional adjustment, without establishing stronger effects than EA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42888452What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.