ReviewJournal of medical case reports2026
Foreign body ingestion: how common is it really? A review and our experience managing a young woman: a case report.
Review in Journal of medical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhether foreign body ingestion is the bigger problem or the underlying condition which prompts such behavior. Nowadays, published cases are evident enough to indicate the increasing frequency of foreign body ingestion reporting in the emergency department, particularly patients with psychiatric illnesses. Diagnosis is often prompted by complications such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and weight loss. The details of most recently published cases and their management are discussed in this article to have an idea that how commonly this condition is encountered in medical practice. CASE PRESENTATION: This report presents a case of a 22-year-old Indian origin Muslim female, presented in our hospital with pain abdomen, nausea and vomiting just after taking meals. The patient's attendant mentioned that the ingestion was motivated by anger and a desire for attention from her parents and husband. An X-ray of the erect abdomen performed 8 days prior revealed heavy metal ingestion, and a computed tomography (CT) scan conducted 1 day before admission confirmed the presence of multiple foreign bodies in the stomach. On the day of surgery, a contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) abdomen localized the cluster of foreign bodies in the second part of the duodenum. Initial attempts to remove the objects endoscopically were unsuccessful, necessitating surgical intervention after endoscopic retrieval failed.
conclusionThe incidence of foreign body ingestion seems to be increasing, with most cases managed endoscopically. However, in this case, the size and weight of the ingested objects, along with their clustering due to presence of magnets, made endoscopic retrieval challenging. This case highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in managing complex foreign body ingestions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42888443What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.