ArticleGenome medicine2026
Decoding coupled epigenetic-fragmentomic signals in circulating cell-free DNA for interpretable cancer diagnosis.
Article in Genome medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPlasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) whole-genome methylation sequencing enables simultaneous characterization of DNA methylation and fragmentomic features for cancer detection. However, it remains unclear whether methylation library preparation faithfully preserves fragmentomic signals, how methylation and fragmentation are biologically coupled, and how these two modalities can be systematically integrated.
methodsWe systematically evaluated the preservation of cfDNA fragmentomic features in whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) and enzymatic methyl sequencing (EM-seq) relative to conventional whole-genome sequencing (WGS). We next investigated the biological relationship between methylation and fragmentation and delineated methylation haplotype blocks (MHBs) directly from plasma cfDNA as biologically interpretable units for organizing multimodal cfDNA signals. Guided by these findings, we developed multimodal diagnostic models integrating complementary methylation and fragmentomic features.
resultsCanonical cfDNA fragmentomic patterns were partially preserved across methylation sequencing protocols, although the degree of preservation varied among individual features. DNA methylation levels were associated with characteristic fragment length and end-motif patterns. Plasma-derived MHBs exhibited tissue-associated regulatory features and distinct patterns of chromatin accessibility, repeat enrichment, and methylation heterogeneity, providing biologically interpretable units for integrated cfDNA analysis. Within these regions, methylation and fragmentomic signals exhibited coordinated yet complementary patterns. Leveraging this framework, we developed Fragmentomics And Methylation Ensemble (FAME), an interpretable multimodal model integrating MHB-centered methylation and fragmentomic features for cancer detection and tissue-of-origin prediction, and further extended it with complementary genome-wide methylation and fragmentomic features to generate a genome-wide-augmented FAME model (FAME-GW). Across cross-validation, independent validation, and comparisons with THEMIS (THorough Epigenetic Marker Integration Solution), SPOT-MAS (screening for the presence of tumor by methylation and size), and DELFI (DNA evaluation of fragments for early interception), FAME-based models achieved robust diagnostic performance, with FAME providing a compact and interpretable representation and FAME-GW delivering the strongest overall predictive performance.
conclusionsOur study demonstrates that cfDNA whole-genome methylation sequencing partially preserves informative fragmentomic signals and establishes plasma-derived MHBs as biologically interpretable units for organizing and integrating complementary methylation and fragmentomic information. This framework provides insight into the coupling of epigenetic and fragmentomic information and an effective strategy for interpretable cfDNA-based cancer diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42888434What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.