Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42888372›Full record

ArticleThe patient2026

Educational Materials for Health-Related Discrete Choice Experiments: A Theory-Driven Approach.

Stella Maria Marceta, Huib Karel Tabbers, Bjorn Benny de Koning, Marie Falahee, Esther Wilhelmina de Bekker-Grob, Jorien Veldwijk

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The patient, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stella Maria MarcetaErasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. marceta@eshpm.eur.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2991-5442
Huib Karel TabbersErasmus School of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-6912-7683
Bjorn Benny de KoningErasmus School of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5136-2261
Marie FalaheeDepartment of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5928-486X
Esther Wilhelmina de Bekker-GrobErasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7645-6168
Jorien VeldwijkErasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4822-5068

Funding

Arthritis Research UK 23322Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam Erasmus Initiative 'Smart Choices for Better Health 2.0. (Evaluation of Health Care)National Institute for Health and Care Research 163261Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 09150171910002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo make informed choices in health-related discrete choice experiments (DCEs), respondents need to understand the choice scenarios, alternatives, attributes and attribute levels presented to them. Respondent populations are often highly diverse in knowledge and experience, leading to varying informational needs that make it challenging to design educational materials that sufficiently inform all respondents without disengaging others. At present, however, structured guidance on developing DCE educational materials is lacking. Drawing on the instructional design literature, this paper investigates whether theory-driven adaptations to educational materials improve respondent comprehension and engagement in health-related DCEs.

methodsInformed by three focus groups on DCE informational needs, we identified four design principles from the instructional design literature relevant to DCE educational materials: whole-task instruction, making inferences explicit, adapting information to respondents' prior knowledge and embedding self-check questions with corrective feedback. Educational materials for three existing DCEs (influenza vaccination, colorectal cancer screening and rheumatoid arthritis prevention) were redesigned to incorporate these principles. Panel respondents (N = 1754) were randomized to receive either the original or the adapted educational materials, and effects on comprehension, engagement, internal validity and choice consistency were assessed.

resultsAdapted materials increased time spent on educational content and were associated with small improvements in selected comprehension outcomes, though effects were often not statistically significant against the co-created comparator. Self-check questions revealed considerable comprehension gaps regardless of condition, underscoring that co-creation and pre-testing alone do not guarantee sufficient respondent comprehension. Educational materials also emerged as a meaningful source of selective dropout in all surveys, predominantly among respondents with lower education levels, posing a risk to sample representativeness that warrants attention in future research. DISCUSSION: Adapting DCE educational materials based on educational theory and instructional design principles offers a promising approach to improving respondent engagement and understanding. To enable cumulative learning, we further encourage researchers to report comprehension outcomes and publish educational materials as supplementary materials.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.