ArticleJournal of biological physics2026
Allocentric navigation is computationally universal.
Article in Journal of biological physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
I present three proofs that idealized neurocomputational architectures capable of navigation guided by allocentric maps with landmark structure can be computationally universal. Navigation may occur online, in the environment, or offline, in the animal's head. The first proof encodes the counters of a two-counter machine as positions of movable markers on orthogonal axes. The second directly simulates a one-tape Turing machine using a writable tape-path embedded in the map. The third realizes the tape-path's predecessor/successor relation through local cues at a two-row landmark track rather than through a globally indexed path primitive. I establish universality in two senses: each class of navigation models is Turing-complete, and each contains a single machine that simulates every machine in its class. These constructions are mathematically close to classical graph-based models, including Kolmogorov-Uspensky machines, storage-modification machines, and graph Turing machines, so the bare computability results are unsurprising. My contribution is to reconstruct them explicitly within an allocentric cognitive-map architecture whose representational and computational primitives are drawn from empirical and theoretical work on spatial navigation and cognitive control. This shows that an allocentric navigation-based architecture can be computationally universal and opens the possibility of reconstructing aspects of biological cognition, including symbolic processing, in navigation-based terms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.