ArticleArchives of virology2026
Insights into goatpox virus and sheeppox virus genomes from pangenome graphs.
Article in Archives of virology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The capripoxviruses comprise three species: goatpox virus (GTPV), sheeppox virus (SPPV) and lumpy skin disease virus (LSDV). They are large double-stranded DNA viruses with highly conserved core genomes and variable terminal regions. Previous studies have described variation in Capripoxvirus gene content, their broader population structure and the contribution of non-coding and structural variation remains opaque. This study investigated the genomic diversity and evolutionary history of GTPV and SPPV using phylogenetics, pangenome variation graphs (PVGs), and gene-specific analyses. We found clear differences in population structure between the two viruses. GTPV had three deeply divergent and genetically stable lineages with limited evidence of recent gene flow, whereas SPPV had weaker clade separation consistent with an ancestral bottleneck followed by recent population expansion. PVG-based analyses indicated that GTPV has a comparatively closed pangenome, while SPPV's was open, particularly at the inverted terminal repeats (ITRs). Structural and haplotype variation was concentrated at these ITRs, which moderate host immunity and specificity. In several lineages, extended putative ORFs spanning adjacent ITR genes were observed, indicating recurrent structural plasticity at these regions. Patterns of gene-specific conservation and divergence highlighted loci under strong constraint and lineage-specific structural changes that may contribute to host specificity. Together, these results demonstrated how graph-based genome models complement gene-based analyses in resolving poxvirus genome evolution and provide a resource for improved comparative and population genomic studies of large DNA viruses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42888350What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.