ArticleBehavior research methods2026
A topic-based framework for interpretable and sparse semantic representations.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In computational approaches to language, semantic representations produced by modern deep learning systems are often encoded as high-dimensional latent vectors that are difficult to interpret. By contrast, cognitive science has emphasized the need for semantic representations with interpretable and cognitively meaningful structures. Although researchers have explored concept representations using corpus-driven distributed embeddings and various feature-based paradigms, a scalable and interpretable framework that can represent linguistic materials across different levels of granularity remains an open methodological challenge. Recent advances in pretrained language models have led to topic modeling methods that leverage these models, such as BERTopic, which uses sentence-level embeddings to derive clusters corresponding to human-interpretable topics. Building on this line of work, the present study introduces a framework, SISTR, for representing Semantics as Interpretable and Sparse Topic-based Representations. The framework extracts interpretable topics from the corpus and models the semantics of linguistic materials via their relations to the derived topics. This framework is designed to accommodate linguistic materials across different levels and languages. We evaluated the interpretability of the resulting topic dimensions through behavioral experiments. We applied this framework to word association tasks and semantic judgments, comparing model predictions with human behavioral data. The results suggest that SISTR achieves competitive performance to existing semantic representation methods while providing sparse and interpretable semantic representations. Overall, SISTR provides a reusable semantic coordinate system that offers an interpretable bridge between linguistic data and cognitive theories of semantic representation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42888337What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.