Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42888309›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

Diagnosis of Suspected Pituitary Microadenomas: The Complementary Role of Habitat-based Non-enhanced MRI Radiomics Features.

Siru Kang, Kai Wang, Yanni Liang, Wenxia Yang, Jing Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Siru KangDepartment of Magnetic Resonance, The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, No. 82 Cuiyingmen, Chengguan District, Lanzhou, 730030, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5740-7950
Kai WangXiaogan Central Hospital, Xiaogan, China.
Yanni LiangDepartment of Magnetic Resonance, The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, No. 82 Cuiyingmen, Chengguan District, Lanzhou, 730030, China.
Wenxia YangDepartment of Magnetic Resonance, The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, No. 82 Cuiyingmen, Chengguan District, Lanzhou, 730030, China.
Jing ZhangDepartment of Magnetic Resonance, The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, No. 82 Cuiyingmen, Chengguan District, Lanzhou, 730030, China. ery_zhangjing@lzu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1678-5688

Funding

the Joint Key Project of Technology Research Program of Gansu Province No. 25JRRA1266
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To develop and validate a combined model for detecting pituitary microadenomas in suspected cases using non-contrast T1-weighted sagittal (T1SAG) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and to assess its performance as a non-contrast imaging-based tool for clinical decision support.This retrospective two-center study enrolled 519 patients with suspected pituitary microadenomas, divided into a training set (n = 321), an internal validation set (n = 80), and an external test set (n = 118). Radiomics features were extracted from both the entire pituitary gland and its habitat subregions, generated via unsupervised K-means clustering. Eight predictive models were constructed using logistic regression: a clinical model, an intra-pituitary radiomics model, three individual habitat models (Habitat 1, 2, and 3), an early-fusion model combining all habitats, an ensemble model integrating the probability outputs of the three habitat models, and a combined model that integrated clinical, intra-pituitary, and the optimal fusion model. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis.Among all models, the combined model demonstrated the best predictive performance across all three cohorts, achieving areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.885 (95% CI: 0.850-0.920) in the training set, 0.788 (95% CI: 0.690-0.885) in the internal validation set, and 0.796 (95% CI: 0.712-0.880) in the external test set. The combined model also achieved the highest accuracy and sensitivity across all datasets.The combined prediction model showed robust performance in distinguishing pituitary microadenomas in suspected cases, offering enhanced clinical decision support while reducing dependence on contrast-enhanced MRI examinations.

Indexed as

Habitat radiomicsNon-contrast magnetic resonance imagingPituitary microadenomaSHAP

Identifiers

PMID42888309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.