Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42888306›Full record

ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2026

A bilateral cervical accessory biceps muscle: anatomical description and clinical implications.

Maria Luísa Rodrigues Oliveira Roque, Lorenzo Ribeiro Dias Vieira, Alice Viçosi da Silva, Josemberg da Silva Baptista

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maria Luísa Rodrigues Oliveira RoqueLaboratory of Applied Morphology (LEMA), Department of Morphology, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Av. Marechal Campos, 1468, Campus de Maruípe Vitória, Vitória, Espírito Santo, 29040-090, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-1677-8615
Lorenzo Ribeiro Dias VieiraLaboratory of Applied Morphology (LEMA), Department of Morphology, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Av. Marechal Campos, 1468, Campus de Maruípe Vitória, Vitória, Espírito Santo, 29040-090, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-5877-3344
Alice Viçosi da SilvaLaboratory of Applied Morphology (LEMA), Department of Morphology, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Av. Marechal Campos, 1468, Campus de Maruípe Vitória, Vitória, Espírito Santo, 29040-090, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-9106-6172
Josemberg da Silva BaptistaLaboratory of Applied Morphology (LEMA), Department of Morphology, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Av. Marechal Campos, 1468, Campus de Maruípe Vitória, Vitória, Espírito Santo, 29040-090, Brazil. josemberg.baptista@ufes.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0514-8170

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAccessory muscles between the levator scapulae and serratus posterior superior are rarely reported and may be interpreted as variants of either adjacent muscle. This study describes bilateral accessory muscles in the posterior cervical and upper thoracic region and discusses their anatomical classification and clinical relevance.

methodsA routine anatomical dissection was performed in a formalin-fixed adult male cadaver. The posterior cervical and upper thoracic regions were dissected to define the topography, attachments, morphology, distal interface, and innervation of the accessory muscles. Morphometric measurements were obtained bilaterally using a caliper.

resultsBilateral elongated muscular structures were identified between the levator scapulae and serratus posterior superior muscles. Each muscle had an individual proximal attachment at the transverse process of the second cervical vertebra, followed an inferomedial course approximately parallel to the splenius capitis, and remained distinct from the main belly of the levator scapulae. Distally, each muscle was separated from the serratus posterior superior by a bursal interface, without direct muscular or aponeurotic continuity or independent scapular insertion. Both muscles were bicipital and fusiform and were innervated by posterior rami that also supplied the splenius capitis.

conclusionThese findings support the interpretation of the structures as paired individualized accessory muscles rather than accessory slips of adjacent muscles, expanding the known spectrum of posterior cervical and upper thoracic anatomical variations.

Indexed as

Anatomic VariationCervical VertebraeNeck MusclesCadaverDissectionHumansMaleAnatomic variationBack musclesCadaverDissectionNeck muscles

Identifiers

PMID42888306
PMCPMC13675304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.