ArticleUpdates in surgery2026
Durable improvements in lipid profile and atherogenic indices more than a decade after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long-term effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) on lipid metabolism, particularly beyond 10 years, are not well defined. This study evaluated changes in standard lipid parameters and atherogenic indices more than 11 years after stand-alone LSG. This retrospective cohort study included adults who underwent primary stand-alone LSG between 2005 and 2009. Patients with revisional bariatric procedures or major gastrointestinal or appetite-related disorders were excluded. Lipid profiles were assessed preoperatively and at follow-up beyond 11 years. Primary outcomes were long-term changes in triglycerides, total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C, and non-HDL-C. Secondary outcomes included changes in the atherogenic index of plasma, triglyceride/HDL-C ratio, Castelli risk indices I and II, atherogenic coefficient, and use of lipid-lowering medications. Multivariable linear regression was used to identify independent predictors of lipid change. Eighty-six patients (79.1%, female) were analyzed, with a mean follow-up of 13.4 ± 1.3 years. Mean total body weight loss (%TBWL) was 28.8 ± 12.5%. Triglyceride levels decreased from 130.7 ± 64.9 to 91.2 ± 36.8 mg/dL, HDL-C increased from 45.2 ± 9.5 to 62.6 ± 14.7 mg/dL, and non-HDL-C decreased from 151.9 ± 38.0 to 134.0 ± 27.4 mg/dL (all p < 0.001). Total cholesterol remained unchanged, while the reduction in LDL-C was no longer significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons. All five atherogenic indices showed significant improvement (p < 0.001). Greater %TBWL was independently associated with higher HDL-C and lower triglyceride levels at follow-up. More than a decade after stand-alone LSG, improvements in triglycerides, HDL-C, non-HDL-C, and atherogenic indices remain robust. However, these findings should be interpreted cautiously regarding cardiovascular and atherosclerotic risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42888299What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.