ArticlePsychopharmacology2026
Chemogenetic inhibition of the ventrolateral orbitofrontal cortex disrupts novelty-guided updating of spatial memories and alters hippocampal engram reactivation.
Article in Psychopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleAdaptive behavior requires revising memories when outcomes deviate from expectations. The orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) is implicated in representing outcome expectancies, but its role in memory-updating, beyond value-based learning, remains unclear.
objectivesWe tested whether the ventrolateral OFC (VLO) contributes to hippocampal-dependent memory-updating in the Objects in Updated Locations (OUL) task, where novelty-driven exploration provides a behavioral readout consistent with successful updating of spatial information.
methodsUsing inhibitory DREADDs, in male and female (Swiss Webster and C57BL/6) mice, we suppressed VLO activity during the Updating session, when new object-location information was introduced.
resultsControl mice preferentially explored the updated object-location configuration during Updating and discriminated between updated and novel object-location configurations at Test, whereas VLO-inhibited mice did not. VLO inhibition when no updating demand was present did not alter exploration of novel object-location configurations or memory for the original spatial configuration at Test.
conclusionsThese results indicate that VLO activity is selectively required when novelty must be interpreted relative to prior experience, implicating this region in evaluating change rather than detecting it. To assess hippocampal ensemble dynamics, we tagged neuronal ensembles, in the dorsal dentate gyrus (dDG) recruited during Updating, followed by quantification of overlap between Updating-tagged cells and ensembles reactivated at Test. We found that VLO inhibition reduced reactivation of Updating-tagged dDG ensembles, paralleling the behavioral impairments observed in the OUL task. These findings support a role for the VLO in hippocampal-dependent memory-updating and extend OFC models beyond reward contexts to include predictive updating of spatial memory representations. CLINICAL TRIAL: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42888285What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.