ReviewJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2026
Circuit-constrained molecular neuroethology in the medicinal leech Hirudo verbana.
Review in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Medicinal leeches have long served as classic systems in comparative neuroethology because individual neurons can be identified across animals and linked to well-defined behaviors. This review argues that Hirudo verbana is now positioned for a new phase in which this identified-cell framework can be connected directly to molecular mechanisms. We first outline the organization and experimental accessibility of the leech nervous system, then evaluate genomic and transcriptomic resources as tools for testing physiologically constrained hypotheses rather than as endpoints in themselves. We focus on selected problems in which behavior, identified neurons, and molecular candidates can be brought into close alignment: sensory encoding, serotonergic state-dependent gating, multifunctional behavioral circuits, heartbeat rhythm generation, and endocannabinoid-dependent plasticity. Across these examples, the comparative value of Hirudo verbana lies not in nervous-system simplicity alone, but in interpretability: receptors, ion channels, pumps, peptides, gap-junction proteins, and metabolic enzymes can be examined in relation to cellular and circuit operations already defined by physiology. Future progress will require tighter integration of circuit-defined phenotypes with cell-resolved transcriptomics, spatial localization, targeted perturbation, and quantitative modeling. This circuit-constrained strategy positions Hirudo verbana as a valuable bridge between classical identified-cell neuroethology and molecular tests of circuit physiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42888254What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.