Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42888220›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2026

Maternal perspectives on sharing newborn genomic data.

Bernarda Prosenc, Mojca Cizek Sajko, Gorazd Kavsek, Marusa Herzog, Borut Peterlin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bernarda ProsencClinical Institute for Genomic Medicine, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Mojca Cizek SajkoClinical Institute for Genomic Medicine, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8859-1199
Gorazd KavsekClinical Department of Perinatology, The Division of Gynaecology and Obstetrics / University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Marusa HerzogClinical Department of Perinatology, The Division of Gynaecology and Obstetrics / University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Borut PeterlinClinical Institute for Genomic Medicine, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia. borut.peterlin@guest.arnes.si.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7824-4978

Funding

The Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency (ARIS) P-0326
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sharing clinical and genomic data is essential for accurate variant interpretation, the advancement of genomic research, and supporting couples planning to conceive. This cross-sectional study examined attitudes toward newborn genomic data sharing in a cohort of peripartum mothers in Slovenia. Among the 1111 respondents, 84% expressed willingness to share anonymized genomic data to benefit other couples and to advance novel diagnostic and preventive strategies. Support was reported by 87% for clinical applications and by 59% for research purposes, while 74% favored international data sharing. Conversely, pronounced hesitation emerged regarding disclosure of identifiable data for non-medical uses, particularly involving insurance providers (82%). Willingness to share genomic data was positively associated with higher educational attainment (p < 0.001), higher levels of genetic knowledge (p < 0.001), and prior experience with genetic testing (p = 0.013). These results emphasize the role of public understanding and trust in the ethical integration of genomic newborn screening initiatives.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.