ArticleNature communications2026
The molecular heterogeneity and clinical impact of genomic driver alterations in prostate cancer.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
61 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prostate cancer is a common malignancy with a heterogeneous disease course. Prior studies have identified a paucity of point mutations in protein-coding genes and only a few clinically relevant driver alterations. Here, using the Pan Prostate Cancer Group whole genome sequencing dataset from 1001 men, we perform an integrative analysis of cancer driver genes by quantifying recurrent genomic alterations among small mutations, structural variants, and copy number alterations in 961 primary prostate tumour samples. We identify at least one recurrent somatic or germline alteration in 97% of tumours and identify putative driver genes and mechanisms of dysregulation including frequently altered regulatory elements. A prominent example is the activation of oncogenes by structural variation-mediated hijacking of onco-enhancers of the solute carrier gene family including SLC30A4. Other recurrent alterations including FOXA1, MDM4, COL5A1, TP53, and BRCA1 stratify with metastatic disease, with additional drivers enriched in African-ancestry tumours. One quarter of tumours have acquired genome-informed therapeutic targets. Unsupervised analysis of alterations reveals four oncotypes with distinct genetic and clinical characteristics, including two clinically unfavourable oncotypes with shorter metastasis-free survival. Our study uncovers the full spectrum and recurrence patterns of genomic driver alterations in primary prostate cancers and delivers targets for biomarker development, mechanistic studies, and potential therapeutic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42888190What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.