Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42888020›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2026

Optimal Two-Phase Sampling Designs for Generalized Raking Estimators With Multiple Parameters of Interest.

Jasper B Yang, Bryan E Shepherd, Thomas Lumley, Pamela A Shaw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jasper B YangDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5736-3574
Bryan E ShepherdDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3758-5992
Thomas LumleyDepartment of Statistics, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4255-5437
Pamela A ShawDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1883-8410

Funding

Tennessee CFAR: Implementation of Culturally Responsive Trauma-Informed Care with Youth with HIV in Memphis, TNP30AI110527 · NIAID · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI John Koethe · 2015 to 2026
$27.5M
Statistical methods and designs for correlated outcome and covariate errors in studies of HIV/AIDSR37AI131771 · NIAID · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Pamela A Shaw, Bryan Earl Shepherd · 2023 to 2026
$3.4M
Statistical methods for correlated outcome and covariate errors in studies of HIV/AIDSR01AI131771 · NIAID · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI SHAW, PAMELA A, SHEPHERD, BRYAN EARL · 2018 to 2022
$3.0M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI110527NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI131771NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI131771NIH HHS P30-AI110527NIH HHS R37-AI131771U.S. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program DGE-2140004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large observational datasets, including those derived from electronic health records, are a valuable resource for medical research but are often affected by missingness, measurement error, and misclassification. Two-phase sampling with generalized raking (GR) estimation is an efficient and robust approach to statistical inference in such settings. In this approach, variables that are unavailable or measured with error in a large Phase 1 cohort are obtained with higher-quality measurements in a Phase 2 subsample. Previous research has studied optimal Phase 2 sampling designs for inverse-probability-weighted (IPW) estimators in nonadaptive, multiparameter settings, and for GR estimators in single-parameter settings. In this work, we extend these results by deriving optimal adaptive, multiwave sampling designs for IPW and GR estimators when multiple parameters are of interest. We propose several practical allocation strategies, examine the design choices that arise when implementing them, and evaluate their performance through extensive simulations and an example using data from people living with HIV attending the Vanderbilt Comprehensive Care Clinic (VCCC). Our results show that independently optimizing allocation for each parameter improves efficiency over traditional case-control sampling. We also derive an integer-valued, A-optimal allocation method that typically outperforms independent optimization. Notably, we find that optimal designs for GR can differ substantially from those for IPW, and that this distinction can meaningfully affect estimator efficiency in the multiple-parameter setting. These findings offer practical guidance for future two-phase studies involving incomplete or error-prone data.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsModels, StatisticalComputer SimulationHIV InfectionsHumansObservational Studies as TopicProbabilityResearch DesignSampling StudiesA‐optimalitygeneralized rakingmeasurement errorNeyman allocationtwo‐phase sampling

Identifiers

PMID42888020
PMCPMC13675120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.