Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42886739›Full record

SynthesisVeterinary medicine and science2026

Aflatoxin M

Md Al Fattah, Md Ahsan Habib

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Veterinary medicine and science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Md Al Fattah *Department of Animal Science and Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary and Animal Science, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9249-9269
Md Ahsan Habib *Department of Animal Science and Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary and Animal Science, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8297-3276

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAflatoxin M OBJECTIVE AND

designTo pool AFM

methodsPrevalences were pooled by DerSimonian-Laird random-effects models with prediction intervals, subgroup, meta-regression, leave-one-out and small-study analyses. Exposure was modelled deterministically and probabilistically (100,000 iterations), with uncertainty tabulated following EFSA guidance.

resultsAcross 20 datasets (N = 605), pooled prevalence was 58.7% (95% CI 51.6%-65.5%; I

conclusionsInfant and child margins of exposure remain far below the 10,000 benchmark under every scenario and robustness check. The estimate is screening-level, resting on transferred parameters and ELISA-based measurement. Monsoon-aware feed management, enforcement of the national milk standard and paired feed-milk surveillance are indicated.

Indexed as

Aflatoxin B1Aflatoxin M1Animal FeedFood ContaminationMilkAnimalsBangladeshDietRisk AssessmentAflatoxin B1Aflatoxin M1aflatoxin B1aflatoxin M1animal feedmeta‐analysismilkmycotoxinsrisk assessmentuncertainty analysis

Identifiers

PMID42886739
PMCPMC13674741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.