Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42886723›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Bridging material culture networks and social networks in archaeology.

Robert J Bischoff, Cecilia Padilla-Iglesias

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Robert J BischoffSchool of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8708-9041
Cecilia Padilla-IglesiasHUMAN ORIGINS - Cluster of Excellence for Integrative Human Origins Studies (EXC 3101), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines whether material culture can serve as a proxy for past social interaction. Using the ArchMatNet agent-based model, we simulate social behavior in small-scale communities and resulting material culture production, then compare social and material culture networks. We compare networks using graph correlation and the quadratic assignment procedure, evaluate parameter effects with generalized additive models, and assess underlying structures with exponential random graph models. Within this simulated system, results show strong correlations between social interaction networks and material culture networks, especially when material culture traits are sufficiently variable. However, correlations weaken under some conditions, particularly low material culture variation, indicating limits to archaeological network inference. Key factors include interaction frequency, learning strategy, and trait visibility. These results characterize hypothetical relationships generated under the model's assumptions; they do not constitute empirical validation. They highlight both the promise and the constraints of using material culture as a proxy for social networks and underscore the need for empirical testing and careful attention to network structure.

Indexed as

ArchaeologySocial NetworkingHumansModels, TheoreticalSocial Behavior

Identifiers

PMID42886723
PMCPMC13674714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.