ArticlePloS one2026
Non-monotonic thickness dependence of MoS2-Sb contact resistance driven by bandgap and interlayer transport.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Contact resistance at metal-two-dimensional semiconductor interfaces is a major factor limiting the performance of emerging two-dimensional electronic devices. Understanding how material thickness influences contact behavior is therefore essential for device optimization. Here, we systematically investigate the layer-dependent contact resistance of MoS2-Sb interfaces using MoS2 field-effect transistors with different layer numbers. Contact resistance was extracted using the transmission line method and compared for devices fabricated on SiO2 and HfO2 gate dielectrics. The results reveal a pronounced non-monotonic dependence of contact resistance on the MoS2 layer number. As the layer number increases from one to three, the contact resistance decreases and reaches a minimum value of 308 Ω·μm for trilayer MoS2, while further increasing the thickness leads to a rise in resistance. Analysis of the electronic band structure and interlayer transport mechanisms indicates that this behavior originates from the competition between bandgap reduction and increasing interlayer transport resistance. In the few-layer regime, bandgap narrowing lowers the Schottky barrier and reduces contact resistance, whereas in thicker layers the growing interlayer resistance dominates carrier transport. These findings provide important insight into thickness-dependent contact physics in two-dimensional semiconductors and offer practical guidance for optimizing contact engineering and channel thickness in next-generation electronic devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.