ArticlePloS one2026
Improved vision transformer for sports image classification via transfer learning and knowledge distillation.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To address the challenges posed by complex visual characteristics in sports image classification, this study proposes an enhanced Vision Transformer (ViT) model built upon the Native Resolution ViT (NaViT) architecture. The principal innovations include replacing conventional single-layer feedforward networks with parallel feedforward networks and introducing an attention-guided distillation framework with input-dependent attention-weighted feature fusion, which adaptively regulates the contribution of frozen distillation features to the prediction pathway. The proposed approach leverages ImageNet-pretrained weights and performs domain-specific fine-tuning on sports datasets. Experimental results demonstrate substantial performance gains. On the multi-sport classification dataset, the proposed model achieves an accuracy of 0.9752 and a Macro-F1 score of 0.9753, outperforming the evaluated CNN benchmarks and ViT variants. For soccer match event classification, it achieves an accuracy of 0.9863 and a Macro-F1 score of 0.9718, while ranking first in the TOPSIS evaluation. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of integrating parallel feedforward processing, transfer learning, and distillation-guided feature fusion for sports image classification under complex visual conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.