Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42886642›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Risk factors for syphilis among newly admitted prisoners: A case-control study.

Thanaset Hiranbandit, Wutthichai Jariya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thanaset HiranbanditDepartment of Community Health, Faculty of Public Health, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0390-9090
Wutthichai JariyaDepartment of Community Health, Faculty of Public Health, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7198-6095

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSyphilis remains a major global public health concern in various groups, including people in prisons, where the burden is substantial. This study aimed to identify factors associated with syphilis infection among newly admitted prisoners in a province of Thailand.

methodsA case-control study was conducted among newly admitted prisoners in three correctional facilities. Cases and controls were randomly selected from newly admitted prisoners who had undergone syphilis screening at prison entry between 01/04/2025 and 30/09/2025. Data were collected using validated data collection instruments, including case record forms and structured questionnaires. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with syphilis infection among newly admitted prisoners, with statistical significance set at p-value < 0.05.

resultsA total of 51 cases and 204 controls were included in the study. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, homosexual or bisexual orientation (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 9.59; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.81-50.92), a history of sexually transmitted infections (AOR = 38.03; 95% CI: 10.46-138.31), anal intercourse (AOR = 4.47; 95% CI: 1.05-19.12), sexual intercourse without condom use (AOR = 13.82; 95% CI: 3.38-56.43), and injection drug use (AOR = 45.60; 95% CI: 2.88-722.12) were significantly associated with syphilis infection among newly admitted prisoners.

conclusionsPrison entry represents a critical opportunity for syphilis screening. Risk-based screening strategies targeting individuals with high-risk sexual behaviors and substance use should be prioritized to reduce syphilis transmission in correctional facilities.

Indexed as

PrisonersSyphilisAdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleRisk FactorsSexual BehaviorThailandYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42886642
PMCPMC13674709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.