Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42886640›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Learning dispositions as a lens for teaching socioscientific issues: Attitudes of university biology students towards animal experimentation.

Jacqueline Dischereit, Susanne Bögeholz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jacqueline DischereitBiology Education, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Lower Saxony, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4868-2226
Susanne BögeholzBiology Education, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Lower Saxony, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5745-7827

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attitudes towards socioscientific issues (SSIs) represent crucial learning dispositions, as they can influence the students' willingness to engage with SSIs. Animal experimentation is a particularly contentious SSI, with attitudes ranging from rejection to acceptance. They are influenced by external factors (e.g., research context, test animal) and internal factors (e.g., knowledge, ethical aspects). Understanding these attitudes is essential for fostering reflective engagement with SSIs in higher education. This study (N = 503) examines self-reported attitudes of pre-service teacher biology students and non-pre-service teacher biology students towards three contexts: animal experimentation with nonhuman primates, animal experimentation with other test animals, and behavioural research with nonhuman primates. It also explores the internal factors underlying these attitudes. Students' attitudes differed across contexts: animal experimentation with nonhuman primates was viewed most critically, while behavioural research was perceived most favourably. Pre-service teacher students expressed more ambivalent and negative attitudes than non-pre-service teacher students. Regarding internal factors, a clear explanatory pattern emerged: "pro" attitudes were mainly explained by knowledge, "ambivalent" attitudes by conditions (e.g., the necessity of the research), and "contra" attitudes by ethical aspects. Pre-service teacher students consistently explained their attitudes with more references to knowledge than non-pre-service teacher students. These findings highlight the need for evidence-based integration of learning dispositions into science (teacher) higher education that explicitly addresses the SSI animal experimentation.

Indexed as

Animal ExperimentationAttitudeBiologyLearningStudentsAcademiaAdultAnimalsFemaleHumansMaleTeachingUniversitiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42886640
PMCPMC13674764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.