ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Mental health and psychosocial wellbeing among beneficiaries of a community-based intervention in Nepal: Findings from a cross-sectional endline evaluation of the PARBARDHAN project.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mental health and psychosocial wellbeing among migrant workers and their families are important public health concerns in Nepal. The PARBARDHAN project used a community-based approach to strengthen mental health and psychosocial support, community participation, and local service capacity in migration-affected communities. This study describes psychosocial wellbeing at endline evaluation and compares findings descriptively with baseline and midline. A cross-sectional, mixed-methods endline evaluation was conducted in Salyan and Kailali districts of Nepal. The quantitative component included 245 project beneficiaries aged 16-80 yearsincluding20 (8.2%) migrant/returnee workers and 225 (91.8%) family/community respondents; 216 (88.2%) reported having a family member currently abroad. Psychological distress was assessed using the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), and anxiety and depression the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL-25). Life satisfaction and subjective happiness were assessed. Qualitative interviews and focus group discussions provided contextual information on project implementation and perceived effects. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics while qualitative data were analysed using framework analysis. Data were collected from3-26 February, 2026. At endline, 34.7% screened positive for psychological distress, while 8.2% screened positive for anxiety and 5.3% for depression (5.3%). Compared with baseline and midline assessment rounds, anxiety and depression screening positivity was lower at endline, whereas probable psychological distress was higher. Qualitative findings indicated increased mental health awareness, greater willingness to seek support, perceived reductions in stigma, and support through self-help groups, peer groups counselling, and community activities. However, substantial dissatisfaction with life was also reported. Because the evaluation rounds used independent cross-sectional samples, the observed differences cannot be interpreted as within-person changes or attributed causally to the PARBARDHAN intervention. The findings indicate the perceived value of community-based mental health and psychosocial support while highlighting continuing economic insecurity, family separation, and other structural factors affecting psychosocial wellbeing.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.