Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42886584›Full record

ArticleJMIR perioperative medicine2026

Patient Blood Management Adoption and Transfusion-Threshold Concordance Among Romanian Anesthesiologists: National Survey Analysis.

Mihai Gabriel Stefan, Daniela Filipescu, Dan Corneci, Cornelia Predoi, Silvius Negoita, Dorel Sandesc, Liana Valeanu, Serban Ion Bubenek Turconi, Stefan Andrei, Dana Tomescu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR perioperative medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mihai Gabriel Stefan *Discipline of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, București, Romania.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9151-3474
Daniela Filipescu *Discipline of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, București, Romania.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2144-464X
Dan CorneciDiscipline of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, București, Romania.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1170-0614
Cornelia PredoiDiscipline of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, București, Romania.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6250-5261
Silvius NegoitaDiscipline of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, București, Romania.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9384-6870
Dorel SandescDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara, Timisoara, Timiș County, Romania.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0349-8257
Liana ValeanuDiscipline of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, București, Romania.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7530-2781
Serban Ion Bubenek TurconiDiscipline of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, București, Romania.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1892-1276
Stefan AndreiDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hôpital Bichat-Claude-Bernard, Paris, Île-de-France, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0216-1380
Dana TomescuDiscipline of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, București, Romania.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9673-5754

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Romania issued national patient blood management (PBM) guidelines in 2018. A 2023 national survey described the overall uptake of PBM among anesthesiologists but did not examine which clinicians and institutions adopted PBM, nor whether stated transfusion thresholds aligned with a study-defined restrictive reference. Objective: This study aimed to identify determinants of PBM adoption and to quantify transfusion-trigger concordance, using a planned, exploratory, cross-sectional secondary analysis of the 2023 survey. Methods: We analyzed 511 responses to the 38-item Romanian Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (SRATI) PBM survey. Three adoption outcomes (applying PBM, a formal hospital PBM group, and routine preoperative anemia treatment) were modeled by multivariable logistic regression against physician grade, hospital category, and local PBM educational events. Eight standardized clinical vignettes (age×cardiac disease×bleeding state) were scored against a restrictive hemoglobin reference (7 g/dL general; 8 g/dL with cardiac disease). The reported timing of the preanesthetic consultation (4 frequency items) was additionally examined as a determinant of preoperative anemia treatment. This was a planned, exploratory secondary analysis; the robustness of the main findings was examined in sensitivity analyses that accounted for survey attrition and for alternative transfusion-threshold scoring rules. Results: Overall, 73.7% (373/506) reported applying PBM, 33.1% (158/477) reported a formal PBM group, and 33.5% (117/349) reported routine preoperative anemia treatment. Local PBM educational events were the strongest adjusted correlate of reported adoption (applying PBM: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 9.78, 95% CI 4.33-22.07; Conclusions: In this exploratory cross-sectional analysis, reported PBM adoption was associated more strongly with local educational activity than with hospital category or physician seniority. Self-reported PBM application was not associated with restrictive stated thresholds in hypothetical scenarios, and respondents selected more liberal thresholds for older patients. Standardized multidisciplinary pathways, earlier anemia screening shared with the surgical team, and education focused on transfusion decisions may help address these gaps. Prospective studies using observed process measures, transfusion practice, and clinical outcomes are needed.

Indexed as

AnesthesiologistsBlood TransfusionGuideline AdherencePractice Patterns, Physicians'AdultAnemiaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRomaniaSurveys and Questionnairesanemiaanesthesiologyguideline adherencehemoglobin thresholdimplementationpatient blood managementRomaniasurveytransfusion

Identifiers

PMID42886584
PMCPMC13674520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.