ArticleInsights into imaging2026
Large language model assistance for report-based carotid plaque AHA classification: a multi-reader study.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate whether large language model assistance improves radiologists' agreement with a text-based reference standard in inferring the modified American Heart Association carotid plaque classification from free-text MRI reports, and whether a lightweight model can perform well under criteria-guided prompting. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included 433 patients from three institutions. In a report-based reader study, four radiologists classified MRI reports with and without large language model assistance. In standalone evaluation, a rule-based baseline and 10 models were compared under naive and criteria-guided prompting. The reference standard was expert consensus based on the report text.
resultsAmong 433 patients (mean age, 65.9 years ± 13.4; 248 males), AI assistance improved six-class agreement with the text-based reference standard. At the vessel level, junior radiologists improved from 61.75% to 83.12% (Qwen3-8B) and 87.75% (DeepSeek-R1); senior radiologists from 77.00% to 87.50% and 92.25%, respectively (all Holm-corrected p < 0.001). Patient-level agreement increased from 41.0% to 78.8% (junior) and from 59.8% to 87.8% (senior) with DeepSeek-R1. Agreement increased (quadratic-weighted κ: 0.231 without AI vs 0.775 with DeepSeek-R1). In standalone evaluation, criteria-guided prompting improved Qwen3-8B agreement from 38.91% to 81.52% (95% CI: 78.87-84.06%), remaining 5.89 percentage points below DeepSeek-R1 (87.41%; 95% CI: 85.10-89.61%).
conclusionIn this report-based classification setting, large language model assistance improved radiologists' agreement with the text-based reference standard, with larger gains in junior radiologists. When prompts explicitly encoded AHA criteria, an 8B local candidate model performed well, supporting its potential use as a standardization aid for text-based workflows. KEY POINTS: Question Report-based modified AHA classification of carotid plaques is experience-dependent and difficult to standardize, as mapping multi-sequence imaging findings to classification conclusions imposes substantial cognitive load. Findings Large language model assistance improved agreement with a text-based reference standard and raised inter-reader consistency (weighted κ 0.231-0.775), narrowing the junior-senior gap. Critical relevance statement Embedding explicit AHA criteria in the prompt let an 8B model approach 671B-model agreement (38.91-81.52%), supporting standardized text-based workflows without fine-tuning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42886459What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.