Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42886459›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2026

Large language model assistance for report-based carotid plaque AHA classification: a multi-reader study.

Mengfei Wang, Yixiao Tang, Yulu Yang, Yifan Tu, Zhongzheng Cao, Runjianya Ling, Kaiyue Sun, Jian Ma, Zhicheng Zhang, Ruipeng Zhang and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Mengfei Wang *Department of Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yixiao Tang *Department of Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yulu YangDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yifan TuDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zhongzheng CaoDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Runjianya LingDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Kaiyue SunDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jian MaDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zhicheng ZhangDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Huaian No.1 People's Hospital, Huaian, China.
Ruipeng ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. zhangrp@sjtu.edu.cn.
Xiaoer WeiDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. weixiaoer_2003@163.com.
Dan WangDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. joshuastonecn@sjtu.edu.cn.
Yuehua LiDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. liyuehua77@sjtu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2417-0867

Funding

Key R&D Sub-project of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China No. 2023YFF1204804National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 8225024Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medicine and Engineering Interdisciplinary Program No. YG2024LC08Shanghai Key Discipline of Medical Imaging No. 2017ZZ02005Shanghai Municipal Commission of Science and Technology Explorer Program No. 23TS1400400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate whether large language model assistance improves radiologists' agreement with a text-based reference standard in inferring the modified American Heart Association carotid plaque classification from free-text MRI reports, and whether a lightweight model can perform well under criteria-guided prompting. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective study included 433 patients from three institutions. In a report-based reader study, four radiologists classified MRI reports with and without large language model assistance. In standalone evaluation, a rule-based baseline and 10 models were compared under naive and criteria-guided prompting. The reference standard was expert consensus based on the report text.

resultsAmong 433 patients (mean age, 65.9 years ± 13.4; 248 males), AI assistance improved six-class agreement with the text-based reference standard. At the vessel level, junior radiologists improved from 61.75% to 83.12% (Qwen3-8B) and 87.75% (DeepSeek-R1); senior radiologists from 77.00% to 87.50% and 92.25%, respectively (all Holm-corrected p < 0.001). Patient-level agreement increased from 41.0% to 78.8% (junior) and from 59.8% to 87.8% (senior) with DeepSeek-R1. Agreement increased (quadratic-weighted κ: 0.231 without AI vs 0.775 with DeepSeek-R1). In standalone evaluation, criteria-guided prompting improved Qwen3-8B agreement from 38.91% to 81.52% (95% CI: 78.87-84.06%), remaining 5.89 percentage points below DeepSeek-R1 (87.41%; 95% CI: 85.10-89.61%).

conclusionIn this report-based classification setting, large language model assistance improved radiologists' agreement with the text-based reference standard, with larger gains in junior radiologists. When prompts explicitly encoded AHA criteria, an 8B local candidate model performed well, supporting its potential use as a standardization aid for text-based workflows. KEY POINTS: Question Report-based modified AHA classification of carotid plaques is experience-dependent and difficult to standardize, as mapping multi-sequence imaging findings to classification conclusions imposes substantial cognitive load. Findings Large language model assistance improved agreement with a text-based reference standard and raised inter-reader consistency (weighted κ 0.231-0.775), narrowing the junior-senior gap. Critical relevance statement Embedding explicit AHA criteria in the prompt let an 8B model approach 671B-model agreement (38.91-81.52%), supporting standardized text-based workflows without fine-tuning.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceCarotid arteriesMagnetic resonance imagingPlaque (atherosclerotic),Stroke

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.