Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42886453›Full record

ReviewBlood research2026

Toward integrated multimodal artificial intelligence in bone marrow examination: current state and open challenges.

Seung Yeob Lee

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Blood research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Seung Yeob LeeDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, 20 Geonji-ro, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju, 54907, Republic of Korea. seungyeoblee@jbnu.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2851-1112

Funding

Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the NRF funded by the Korean government RS-2023-00236157Korean Cell-Based Artificial Blood Project funded by the Korean government RS-2023-KH140972National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2022R1C1C1011518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone marrow (BM) examinations are intrinsically multimodal: hematopathologists integrate peripheral blood, aspirate cytomorphology, trephine histology, flow cytometry, cytogenetics, and molecular genetics data into a single interpretation. Because WHO-HAEM5 and ICC 2022 define entities through integrated morphological, immunophenotypic, cytogenetic, and molecular criteria, multimodal diagnostic reasoning embedded in a procedural workflow, not isolated image classification, represents the appropriate target for the use of artificial intelligence (AI). We review the existing research on integrated multimodal AI systems for BM examination by classifying these systems into three categories: mature single-modality tools; systems that perform cross-modal prediction, in which one modality is estimated from another; and genuine multimodal fusion systems, in which several modalities are jointly ingested by a single model. Evidence is stronger at the single-modality level, where deep learning approaches expert performance in aspirate cytology, trephine histology, and flow cytometry assessments, and the first Food and Drug Administration (FDA) De Novo-authorized all-digital bone marrow aspirate (BMA) application has defined a new device category. On the other hand, while cross-modal prediction is rapidly expanding, genuine multimodal fused systems that jointly ingest matched morphology, flow, molecular, and clinical data to yield unified guideline-aligned recommendations remain unrealized. Direct head-to-head evidence is sparse and endpoint-dependent; nevertheless, the lack of demonstrated superiority over the strongest single-modality comparator does not automatically imply the absence of benefits. The dominant obstacles are fusion of heterogeneous modalities with missing data, absence of large paired multi-institutional datasets and harmonized nomenclature, class imbalances, batch-effect-driven generalization failures, immature explainability, uncertainty quantification, and regulatory pathways. Nevertheless, integrated multimodal AI systems for BM examinations have entered a promising early translational phase, and the field should aim to pursue integration using paired datasets, explicit fusion architectures, calibrated abstention-aware models, and staged prospective validation.

Indexed as

Bone marrow examinationComputational hematopathologyData fusionDeep learningIntegrated diagnosisMultimodal artificial intelligence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.