ReviewMolecular biology reports2026
Precision gene editing in infant neuroblastoma: a review of nanoparticle: enabled CRISPR/Cas9 therapies.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infant neuroblastoma (NB), defined by diagnosis during the first year of life, represents a clinically heterogeneous disease spectrum ranging from localized tumours with favourable outcomes and a capacity for spontaneous regression, to high-risk metastatic disease requiring intensive multimodal therapy. In infants, treatment intensity is determined by disease stage, tumor biology, MYCN status, risk classification, symptoms, response to therapy, and metastatic involvement, particularly relevant to high-risk disease, consequently the potential toxicity of intensive treatment is specific to high-risk disease, as compared to favorable risk tumors which can be managed with surgery, reduced frequency techniques, or observations. Important determinations of neuroblastoma biology and prognosis are genetic alterations involving MYCN and ALK, but the predominately investigated field with therapeutic feasibility of targeting these changes with CRISPR/Cas9 is in preclinical neuroblastoma models rather than in infants. An investigational hypothesis is accordingly considered by their potential relevance to infant neuroblastoma rather than an established clinical application. The safe and efficient in vivo delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 components remains a major challenge, owing to cargo size, immunogenicity, and degradation, particularly within the delicate physiological environment of infants. This review emphasises the need for advanced delivery systems, focusing on the potential of nanoparticle-mediated approaches. Emerging preclinical findings support the feasibility of nanoparticle-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 delivery, although direct evidence in infant neuroblastoma remains limited. Importantly, the evidence for nanoparticle-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 therapy remains largely preclinical. Studies performed in general neuroblastoma models, non-cancer models, or adult cancers should not be interpreted as direct evidence of efficacy in infant neuroblastoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42886411What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.