ReviewMolecular biology reports2026
Stanniocalcin-1 and -2: The insulin-like growth factor system and beyond.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stanniocalcin-1 and -2 (STC1 and STC2) are secreted, highly evolutionarily conserved proteins. STC1 was described more than 40 years ago in teleost fish and implicated in calcium regulation by unknown mechanisms. Soon thereafter, both of the stanniocalcins were reported in mammals, but it was discovered only 10 years ago that they are potent inhibitors of the pappalysin metalloproteinases PAPP-A and PAPP-A2. Through these interactions, STC1 and STC2 indirectly reduce the bioactivity of insulin-like growth factors (IGFs). Beyond this regulatory system, which has been delineated mechanistically at both the functional and structural levels, numerous studies published over the past decade have implicated the stanniocalcins in a wide range of biological processes, including immune modulation, mitochondrial stress responses, integrin engagement, DNA repair, and reproduction. However, the mechanistic evidence supporting these functions is generally less robust, and the reported effects are often context-dependent. This is particularly true for STC1, which can exert opposing effects depending on the cell type and biological context. Proposed intracellular and nuclear activities also raise unresolved questions regarding cellular uptake and trafficking. Defining where, when, and how STC1 and STC2 act is therefore essential for understanding their physiological roles in these processes. This review critically evaluates the molecular functions attributed to mammalian STC1 and STC2, with an emphasis on direct protein interactions and the extent to which proposed functions are supported by structural, biochemical, genetic, and functional evidence. Determining to what extent the diverse reported effects converge on shared mechanisms will be essential for developing a coherent understanding of stanniocalcin biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42886402What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.