ReviewMolecular biology reports2026
Harnessing the ubiquitin-proteasome system: advances and challenges of PROTACs in breast cancer.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is one of the most significant health issues in the world, and resistance to treatment and a lack of targets that can be addressed with drugs limit the effectiveness of the existing treatment options. The development of proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) has shifted the concept of occupancy-based inhibition toward event-based targeted protein degradation. Avoiding ubiquitin-proteasome hijacking, PROTACs target disease-relevant proteins to E3 ligases, allowing them to be catalytically degraded, thereby eliminating formerly undruggable or resistant targets. Their modular design, consisting of a warhead, linker, and E3 ligase ligand, eases rational design, but there are still difficulties, including hook effects, poor pharmacokinetics, and off-target toxicity. PROTACs have been known to undergo evolution, such as PHOTACs, CLIPTACs, and RIBOTACs, which have expanded therapeutic approaches. Clinical trial molecules such as ARV-471 have demonstrated an effective role in the degradation of ER+, showcasing their broader significance in HER2 by degrading BRD4, CDK, and PD-L1. However, a knowledge gap exists that limits our understanding of E3 ligases, constraining their tissue specificity and metabolism. Prospective directions focus on computational strategies to design E3 ligase-based PROTAC prodrugs, nanostructured PROTACs, and test them in vivo using organoids and xenograft models. Overall, PROTACs can become a novel therapeutic approach in the treatment of breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42886396What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.