ArticleMolecular biology reports2026
FAS and FASL expression in autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome and immune thrombocytopenia: limited diagnostic utility as transcriptional biomarkers.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAutoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome (ALPS) is an immune dysregulation disorder caused by defective lymphocyte apoptosis, most commonly involving the FAS-FAS ligand pathway. Because ALPS frequently presents with autoimmune cytopenias, particularly immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), its diagnosis may be challenging. This study evaluated whether FAS and FAS ligand gene expression could distinguish ALPS from ITP.
methodsFAS and FAS ligand messenger RNA expression was measured by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction in whole-blood samples from patients with pediatric-onset ALPS (n = 24), patients with chronic ITP (n = 27), and healthy controls (n = 22). Expression levels were compared among groups, and their diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
resultsFAS expression was significantly higher in patients with ALPS than in healthy controls (p < 0.01), but no significant difference was observed between ALPS and ITP. FAS expression showed moderate discrimination between ALPS and healthy controls but poor discrimination between ALPS and ITP. FAS ligand expression did not differ significantly among groups and showed no meaningful diagnostic performance. Neither FAS nor FAS ligand expression correlated with double-negative T-cell percentages or differed according to treatment status in patients with ALPS.
conclusionsFAS and FAS ligand transcriptional levels do not provide disease-specific discrimination between ALPS and ITP. These findings support the continued use of clinical, immunophenotypic, functional, and genetic investigations for the diagnosis of ALPS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42886380What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.