Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42886374›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2026

Outcomes of abdominal wall reconstruction with and without concurrent skin excision: a single-surgeon retrospective cohort study.

A Iqbal, M Baltatzis, R Shaban, A Tyurkylmaz, S Jamdar, A J Sheen

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A IqbalDepartment of Surgery, Manchester Foundation NHS Trust, Manchester, UK.
M BaltatzisDepartment of Surgery, Salford Royal Foundation NHS Trust, Salford, UK.
R ShabanDepartment of Surgery, Manchester Foundation NHS Trust, Manchester, UK.
A TyurkylmazDepartment of Surgery, Manchester Foundation NHS Trust, Manchester, UK.
S JamdarDepartment of Surgery, Manchester Foundation NHS Trust, Manchester, UK.
A J SheenDepartment of Surgery, Manchester Foundation NHS Trust, Manchester, UK. a.sheen@manchestersurgicalclinic.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe primary objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of incisional hernia repairs performed by a single surgeon, with and without concurrent skin excisions. Given the increasing prevalence of incisional hernias and the growing need for comprehensive abdominal wall reconstruction, this study aimed to determine whether the addition of skin excision significantly affects postoperative outcomes, including length of hospital stay (LOS), complication rates, and wound infection incidence. Furthermore, the study explored the influence of patient-related factors such as body mass index (BMI) and hernia size on surgical outcomes.

methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 94 patients who underwent incisional hernia repairs between 2019 and 2023. These patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent hernia repair without skin excision (n = 52, 55%) and those who had skin excision as part of the procedure (n = 42, 45%). Key outcome measures included LOS, postoperative complications, and wound infection rates. Additionally, patients were stratified based on BMI (≥ 30 vs. <30) to assess its impact on surgical outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson's chi-square and one-way ANOVA tests, with significance defined as p < 0.05.

resultsThe median age of patients in the study cohort was 57 years (range: 24-88 years). Patients who did not undergo skin excision had a significantly shorter LOS compared to those who underwent concurrent skin excision (mean: 2.8 days vs. 6.8 days, p = 0.023). Despite the extended hospitalisation in the skin excision group, overall complication rates were comparable between the two cohorts (34% vs. 31%, p = 0.436). There was no statistically significant difference in wound infection rates between the no-skin-excision and skin-excision groups (23% vs. 16%, p = 0.441). BMI was found to be a significant factor influencing postoperative outcomes. Patients with a BMI of ≥ 30 (n = 10) exhibited a markedly higher incidence of postoperative complications and wound infections (p < 0.001), though BMI did not appear to affect LOS (p = 0.962). Additionally, the size of the hernia was an important determinant of surgical outcomes. Larger hernias (≥ 6 cm) were associated with a longer LOS compared to smaller hernias (mean: 6.4 days vs. 2.8 days, p = 0.051). While there was a trend towards a higher complication rate in larger hernia repairs, the difference did not reach statistical significance.

conclusionPatients undergoing concurrent skin excision experienced a longer hospital stay, whereas postoperative complication and wound infection rates were comparable between groups on univariable analysis. However, without multivariable adjustment, these findings should be interpreted as associations rather than evidence of an independent effect of skin excision. Patients with BMI ≥ 30 had higher complication rates, although the small subgroup size limits definitive conclusions. Larger prospective studies are required to clarify these associations and inform clinical practice.

Indexed as

Abdominal WallHerniorrhaphyIncisional HerniaAdultAgedBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesSurgical Wound InfectionTreatment OutcomeAbdominal wall reconstructionBody mass index (BMI)PanniculectomyPostoperative complicationsSkin excisionSurgical site infectionVentral hernia repair

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.