ArticlePediatric cardiology2026
Are we Adhering to Guidelines for Follow-up Imaging in Neonates with Simple Congenital Heart Defects? What are the Healthcare Costs of Non-adherence?
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Simple congenital heart defects (CHDs) are frequently identified via neonatal echocardiograms ("echos"). In 2020, the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology issued guidelines for follow-up imaging of CHDs. In this retrospective study, we evaluated adherence to these guidelines at an academic health center in Southeastern Ontario. The cohort included neonates who had one or more simple CHDs diagnosed in the first 30 days of life between April 1, 2020, and March 31, 2024. We reviewed electronic medical records up to September 30, 2025 to examine (a) rates of non-adherence to guideline-recommended follow-up imaging; (b) factors that may contribute to non-adherence; and (c) the costs of excessive imaging. Among 248 patients, 376 echos were performed over the study period. Adherence status could be determined for 320. Follow-up for 39.7% of echos did not adhere to the guidelines, primarily because repeat echos were performed earlier than recommended. Non-adherence was substantially higher for lesions requiring surveillance imaging, as per guidelines, compared with lesions where follow-up imaging is not recommended or findings were normal (91.9% vs. 12.0%; OR = 83.4, 95% CI: 37.5-185.5). The pediatric cardiologist's recommendation was documented for 74.5% of echos, but only 48.9% of recommendations aligned with the guidelines. Non-adherence was higher when recommendations were not documented or deviated from the guidelines. Sixty-two echos were deemed excessive, corresponding to $13,339 in extra imaging costs. The high rate of non-adherence to guideline-recommended follow-up imaging for simple CHDs highlights an opportunity to reduce unnecessary healthcare costs through consistent documentation of guideline-aligned follow-up recommendations by pediatric cardiologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42886362What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.