ArticleExperimental brain research2026
A multimodal framework to assess differences in dynamic visual acuity between athletes with and without recent sport-related concussion.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sport-related concussions (SRC) commonly affect vision and cognition, but there is limited understanding of how concurrent balance and exertion demands may affect visual-cognitive performance beyond symptom resolution.Purpose To determine if a dynamic visual acuity (DVA) task performed during standing and walking could differentiate performance between athletes with and without concussion history.Methods Interuniversity athletes (N = 30, age = 20.9 years ± 1.4) with SRC history who were asymptomatic (SRC = 14; females = 6) were compared to athletes without SRC (CONTROL = 16; female = 7). A DVA task was completed while seated, standing, and during low- and moderate-intensity treadmill walking. A Tumbling 'E' target was presented randomly in either random walk (R) or horizontal (H) motion (2.31 m/s), in one of four orientations; responses were selected using a handheld keypad. Performance was characterized as a change in DVA score from Seated (logMAR) and response time (RT, ms). A linear mixed-effects model was fitted for DVA change scores and a generalized mixed effects model for median RT.Results The SRC group exhibited worse DVA change scores during standing and walking compared to CONTROL (p < .05) during R-motion only. Whereas both groups responded faster during treadmill walking for both R- and H-motion (p < .001). Only two athletes (14%) in the SRC group experienced mild symptoms that did not affect performance during the protocol.Conclusion A multimodal DVA assessment, including standing and walking conditions, may be a feasible approach to detect differences in visual-cognitive performance for athletes following clinical recovery of concussion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42886345What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.