ArticleDiscover nano2026
Negligible impact of UV-curable resist shrinkage on NIL pattern fidelity.
Article in Discover nano, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Shrinkage of UV-curable resists during nanoimprint lithography (NIL) has long been regarded as a potential source of pattern distortion; however, direct experimental validation of this effect remains scarce. Here, we systematically investigate the influence of resist shrinkage on the imprinted pattern fidelity using two UV-curable resins with distinct volumetric shrinkage ratios (6.8% and 2.6%). Despite this substantial difference, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) reveals no discernible degradation in fidelity of either micro- or nanoscale features across all samples. Notably, certain previously reported distortions may, in fact, originate from electron-beam-induced effects during SEM observation rather than intrinsic material shrinkage. To further quantify macroscopic effects, the profiles of millimeter-scale imprinted lenses were characterized via white-light interferometry. Relative to the mold, the lenses fabricated with resins exhibiting volumetric shrinkage of 6.8% and 2.6% show actual dimensional shrinkage of only 2.5% and 0.36%, respectively. These results indicate that resist shrinkage is largely compensated by the refilling of mold cavities from the residual layer prior to complete curing. Collectively, this work provides compelling experimental evidence that, within the commonly used range, resist shrinkage does not inherently compromise pattern fidelity in NIL.
Identifiers
42886328What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.